Iran Politics Club      
               
     
Website For Thinking Iranians
 
Back to index Will Islam Fuel World War III?

Will Islam Fuel World War III?
Nicholas Ginex
nickginex@gmail.com
February 18, 2016

On April 6, 2009, according to President Barack Obama, “The United States is not and will never be at war with Islam.”  He believes, “Islam is a religion that preaches peace.”  For an educated man, Obama has had a poor schooling of the history of Islam.  He appears to be unaware that after the death of Muhammad in 632 CE, in only 29 years, the fifth Muslim leader, Muawiya ruled a Muslim empire that extended over an enormous territory, stretching from India to Spain.

The first caliph had been concerned only with spreading Islam among the Arabs in Saudi Arabia.  Motivated by power and wealth, by 750 CE, the Muslim leaders forced conversion to Islam in all conquered territories by presenting two alternatives: death by the sword or pay a tax.  The Islamic Empire extended from the Byzantine and Persian empires, and continued along the Mediterranean as far west as Spain and all of North Africa, including its east coast down to the island Madagascar, and further east to the northern half of India.  

The history of Islam verifies that it is a religion that has grown by taking the wealth of other countries, will not tolerate the existence of other religions, and forced conversion to Islam not through peace and love but by the choice of death or pay a tax to survive.

All Muslims are taught the Qur’an, which is implemented by Sharia law.  The Qur’an has many passages that incite: bigotry against Jews, Christians and other religious groups; hatred for those who worship a god other than Allah; and violence and murder of those who slander the prophet Muhammad, who become apostates, homosexuals, or are of another faith.  A brief history of Islam and many passages in the Qur’an that cause Muslims to hate and kill people of other religions is provided in Obama, Islam and Benghazi published by Hancock Press.  It describes how Muslims are taught to believe they have the only true religion and that Islam will prevail over all other religions.  In light of the history of Islam and the abominable passages in the Qur’an, we must question why does Obama publically proclaim Islam is a religion of peace?

The unrealistic belief by Obama that Islam preaches peace may be due to his indoctrination of the Qur’an.  As a young boy in Jakata, Indonesia, he was registered as a Muslim in elementary school and was taught daily to read and write in Arabic, read and recite the Qur’an, and study the laws of Islam.  This early indoctrination has greatly influenced his affinity for Islam and the Muslim people. 

On September 25, 2012, Obama announced at the UN General Assembly, “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”  This threat at an international forum warns all countries that their future is in jeopardy if the prophet of Islam is slandered.  Is Obama truly a Christian when he strongly supports an Islamic prophet knowing hundreds of thousands of Christians have been killed by Islamic extremists?  It would be expected that a Muslim leader would have made such a pronouncement.  It is unconscionable that Obama, a United States President, would issue a threat to all countries on behalf of an Islam prophet. 

A lack of Islamic history and Obama’s early indoctrination of the Qur’an may be reason for his arrogance to proclaim Islam is a religion of peace.  Such arrogance may explain why he initiated the Obama-Iran Nuclear Deal, which infuses 150 billion dollars into Iran’s economy and allows them to pursue development of a nuclear bomb.  This deal was negotiated while Iranian leaders and Muslims chanted, “Death to America and Death to Israel!!” Does Obama care about the security of the United States or the growth of Iran and the acceptance of an Islamic ideology by Americans? 

According to Obama, “The United States is not and will never be at war with Islam.”   WWIII will become a reality by the incessant advance of an Islamic cancer that has already destroyed cities in many countries.  War will commence after Iran and militant Islamic extremists have grown to such an extent by aggressive force that many free-loving countries will have to defend their people and land by fighting back.  The U.S and its allies will, out of necessity, fight those countries supporting Islamic terror because they will have no alternative.  In addition to Israel and the U.S., Germany, France, Canada, Spain, Australia, Russia, China, United Kingdom (England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland), Sweden, Switzerland, Belgium, Norway, Finland, Bulgaria, and even Egypt and Jordan may become part of the coalition force.  Many countries have already felt the threat and loss of their sovereignty as Muslims migrate into their lands and refuse to integrate and accept their laws and cultural values.  This outcome has been documented for some of these countries in the October 2015 publication of Obama, Islam and Benghazi.

Islam Ideology may cause World War III.

War is the alternative if Islamic religious and political leaders do not acknowledge that it is their ideology taught from The Qur’an and implemented with Sharia law that must be revised.  No scripture should exist that teaches it is the only true religion, the religion of truth, and will prevail over all religions (Qur’an 9:29 and 9:33).

Islam will never be a peaceful nation as it is bound by The Qur’an and Sharia law to spread its ideology to all people.  Americans are ignorant of what the Qur’an actually contains.  It is a manual used by religious leaders to indoctrinate Muslims to commit bigotry, hate, violence, and the killing of innocent people who do not believe in Islam.  People in America and many countries need to learn why Muslims will never assimilate the cultural values of another country.  They need to learn how Islam grew to be a Theocratic Empire by 750 CE through use of the sword and not by love and respect for the beliefs of other people. Only by reading Iran’s history will people understand Islam’s despicable past and its objective for world domination.  Figure 1 illustrates the effect of an ideology that transforms people to advocate Islam will dominate the world.


Figure 1.  Islamic terrorists advocate Islam will Dominate the World.

An opportunity exists for people to benefit from the knowledge scholars have provided by their objective critique of The Qur’an.  A good recommendation is to read Obama, Islam and Benghazi, which may be read as a free read on the IPC Website

Nicholas Ginex Index

People may learn why Obama has a strong affinity for Islam and the Muslim people by reading Obama, Islam and Benghazi.  It provides a history why Islam is the source of discontent in many countries; reveals portions of the Qur’an that incite terror and violence; describes how Muslims are indoctrinated by Islamic religious leaders with the belief that We, Our and Us is Allah; presents details of the Benghazi attack, and contains thirty-seven questions that should be addressed by the Select Committee on Benghazi.  Knowledge is a wonderful gift and much of it is presented in this book.

How should the U.S. deal with Iran’s expansionist objective to develop a nuclear weapon and dominate the world?  There is no alternative: either live with an enemy that seeks to destroy the U.S., its ally Israel, and dominate countries around the world or, conquer Iran by war or starve it economically.   The Obama-Iran Nuclear Deal has made it easier for Iran to pursue their development of a nuclear bomb, infuse $150,000 billion dollars into their economy, and support terrorist operations.  Why would the U.S. make such a stupid move?  Actually, it was not the U.S. Congress representing the American people; it was Obama who has an affinity for Iran and the Muslim people, whereby he facilitated the nuclear deal, which was endorsed by the United Nations Security Council (http://www.voanews.com/content/un-security-council-expected-to-approve-iran-nuclear-deal/2870048.html).

The American people, due to a liberal or politically corrupted media, has not been informed that Obama has been indoctrinated in the Qur’an as a young boy and it has, in his adult years, affected his reasoning to think objectively for the safety of the United States.  One must never forget the failure of the U.S. media to inform Americans and many countries about the threat announced by Obama at the U.N. General Assembly, “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”  Obama stated this Islamic threat two weeks after the Benghazi attack.  Regardless of the context in which he stated this threat, one would expect a Muslim Leader not a U.S. President to make such a statement.

A Realistic and Practical Approach by America.

Iran will pursue a nuclear bomb with or without the Obama-Iran Nuclear Deal.  There is no other recourse for America but to stand up to Iran with a strong position that they STOP all development of a nuclear weapon or allow, anytime and anywhere, 24/7 inspections by American scientists.  Failure to do so will mean no ‘snapback sanctions’ or war but a military strike on all known nuclear sites.  To not take this position, the U.S. will gamble the lives of its people and destruction of its land because Iran will eventually initiate a nuclear bomb first.  He who hesitates is lost.

There is a peaceful solution.

There must be a stop to the destructive cancer infecting free countries around the world with an ideology taught by Islamic religious leaders.  This ideology is driven by the Qur’an and Sharia law, which indoctrinates Muslims with an intolerance of the religious beliefs of others as demonstrated by their objective to dominate the world and publically chant, “Death to America and Death to Israel.”  Islam is a cancerous growth that insidiously affects many countries around the world because Muslims will never integrate with other people and assimilate their cultural values and laws.

The prophetic words of this article should be sufficient to wake people up around the globe.  Figure 2 substantiates the indoctrinated mind-set of Muslims to eliminate the democratic freedoms countries have fought for.  When Muslims are willing to behead people who disagree with their religion it verifies they are unable to use logic to compare, analyze, and scrutinize other religions.  They are unable to assess how their own religion has limited their ability to think and reason constructively.  Chapter 5.2, Indoctrination of the Muslim Mind, presented in Obama, Islam and Benghazi provides an excellent understanding how Muslims become gullible and easily ruled by their Muslim leaders.


Figure 2.  Muslims inciting hate, terror and violence.

The people of Iran and perceptive Islamic religious leaders must initiate a religious revolution of The Qur’an.  However impractical and unrealistic this endeavor is, they need to revise its many verses that infect the Muslim mind with bigotry, hate, violence, and the killing of innocent people who have other religious beliefs.  It is The Qur’an that is the source of discontent in many, many countries.   If Islamic religious leaders are reluctant to revise The Qur’an with God’s greatest command, “love one another” then a revolution by the people becomes necessary.  Failure to revise The Qur’an with God’s greatest command will initiate an inevitable solution - the U.S realistic and practical approach cited above.

Benghazi Oct 22 Hearing Evidence and More

At the Benghazi hearing held on October 22, 2015, Republican Congressman Jim Jordan of Ohio was able to have Hillary Clinton confirm three pieces of evidence that showed clearly, indubitably, and indisputably that she knew the attack on Benghazi was a pre-meditated, pre-planned terrorist attack.  Clinton knew the reality of a planned terrorist attack and yet on the same day issued a statement that it was due to a video defaming the prophet Muhammad.  The evidence provided by Jim Jordan provides a smoking gun for further investigation because it confirms she and President Obama fabricated a YouTube story to deceive the American people.  They both announced their fabricated lie over a two-week period saying that the attack was spontaneous due to the video.

The evidence by Jim Jordan has been time-lined by journalist John Nolte who wrote a Breitbart report on October 23, which confirms the YouTube story by Hillary and Obama was a fabrication. His report revealed what then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, President Obama, the White House, and various administration agencies knew; and when they knew it.  Mr. Nolte’s report may be read at:

Timeline: Gowdy Committee Verifies Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi Cover

September 11, 6:07 p.m. evidence:  Mr. Nolte wrote that at 6:07 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, “The State Department’s Operations Center sends an email to the White House, Pentagon, FBI and other government agencies that said Ansar al-Sharia has claimed credit for the attack on its Facebook and Twitter accounts.”  His source was FactCheck.org.  At that time, the Benghazi terrorist attack was still underway against the consulate and CIA compound.  The whereabouts of Ambassador Chris Stevens were unknown, but the White House State Department had been informed of the attack and that Sean Smith had been killed by al-Sharia terrorists. 

September 11, 8:00 pm evidence: Congressman Jordan presented damaging evidence that revealed Hillary Clinton knew the attack was by al-Qaida.  On the night of September 11, 2012 she had a phone conversation with Libyan President Mohamed Magariaf.  Soon after Hillary wrote an e-mail to the State Department, “We have asked for the Libyan government to provide additional security to the compound immediately as there is a gun battle ongoing, which I understand Ansar as Sharia is claiming responsibility for."   Hillary’s e-mail acknowledges the first-hand knowledge by a Libyan President that al-Sharia claimed responsibility for the terror attack.

September 11, 8:00 pm evidence: Gregory Hicks, the State Department No. 2 official on Libya at the time of the Benghazi siege, spoke directly with Clinton and some of her top advisors by telephone.  He indicated the attack involved an al-Qaeda-affiliated Ansar al-Sharia terrorist group and that Ambassador Stevens might be at a hospital they controlled. 

September 11, 10:00 pm Obama-Clinton phone call: Andrew C. McCarthy wrote an article on May 18, 2013 for the National Review, which highlighted an obvious observation that has been overlooked by the U.S. media and, as of today, has not been brought up by the Select Committee on Benghazi; it is about the mysterious 10:00 pm phone call between President Obama and Hillary Clinton.  We do know that after this phone call Hillary issued a Benghazi statement about 8 minutes later.  It would appear that Hillary and Obama agreed to place the blame on a YouTube video since her statement referred to an “intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others.”  It is evident that the phone call was authorization to proceed with a fabricated story that a video precipitated the terror attack. McCarthy made a clear assessment by writing, “Benghazi is about derelictions of duty by President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton before and during the massacre of our ambassador and three other American officials, as well as Obama and Clinton’s fraud on the public afterward.”  The 10:00 pm Obama-Clinton phone has yet to be revealed to the public.

September 12, 10:08 pm evidence: Two hours after the death of Sean Smith, Hillary Clinton issued a statement that had to have been authorized by the Obama-Clinton phone call.  Shown below, it alludes to the YouTube video that later became the focus as the cause of the terror attack.  She avoids referring to the terror attack by al-Qaida, an Islamic extremist group.

Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi Statement: Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.

September 11, 11:12 pm evidence: Select Committee Congressman Jim Jordan presented an e-mail sent by Hillary Clinton to her daughter Chelsea, which confirmed she was convinced the attack was by al-Qaida terrorists.  Hillary wrote, “Two of our officers were killed in Benghazi by an Al Queda-like group: The Ambassador, whom I handpicked and a young communications officer on temporary duty w a wife and two young children.  A very hard day and I fear more of the same tomorrow.” Hillary spoke about two officers killed in the Benghazi attack but no mention of a video.

September 12 evidence: Less than 24 hours after the terror attack, Clinton told Egyptian Prime Minister Hesham Kandil, “We know the attack had nothing to do with the film.  It was a planned attack, not a protest . . . Based on the information we saw today, we believe that the group that claimed responsibility for this was affiliated with al-Qaeda.”  At this time, after issuing her statement about a video denigrating the religious beliefs of others she tells the Prime Minister the attack had nothing to do with the film.  However, President Obama continued the YouTube theme that same day at the White House Rose Garden.

September 12 evidence: At the Rose Garden of the White House, President Obama continued Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi statement by paraphrasing her words, “We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others.  But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence.  None.”  The fabricated YouTube story has received the blessing of President Obama and set the stage for White House staff members to follow suit.

September 13 evidence:  One day after Hillary Clinton agreed with the Prime Minister of Egypt that the attack had nothing to do with the video she contradicted herself by blaming the anti-Muslim video in accordance with Obama’s Rose Garden announcement by stating:

“Unfortunately, however, over the last 24 hours, we have also seen violence spread elsewhere. Some seek to justify this behavior as a response to inflammatory, despicable material posted on the Internet. As I said earlier today, the United States rejects both the content and the message of that video. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. At our meeting earlier today, my colleague, the foreign minister of Morocco, said that all prophets should be respected because they are all symbols of our humanity, for all humanity.”

In answer to Jim Jordan questions about the Benghazi terror attack was pre-planned, to defend her contradictions, Hillary said, “We hadn't had completely sure positive proof that the video had nothing to do with it until seven days after the attack on Sept. 18, when the video footage about the compound arrived and we saw it."  But here again was another bold-faced lie because the White House was able to view the terrorist attack live with a drone that flew over the compound. More damaging than a White House strategy to divert blame for the Benghazi attack on a YouTube video was a cover-up that the DOD knew several days in advance of the attack that the Muslim Brotherhood had a plan to kill Americans.  Some details of the report were written by Leo Hohmann in May of 2015, over three months before the terror attack.

May 18, 2015, World Net Daily report by Leo Hohmann. It is surprising that the Select Committee on Benghazi did not bring up the facts surfaced by Judicial Watch led by its President Tom Fitton, that both Hillary Clinton and President Obama knew of an al-Qaida and Muslim Brotherhood plan 10 days in advance of the Benghazi terror attack “to kill as many Americans as possible.”  A federal court ordered the government hand over more than 100 pages of previously secret documents that showed then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and other senior Obama officials were given reports within hours of the September 11, 2012, attack.  In those memos, the DOD described details of the plan and there was no mention of a provocative YouTube video, which has been proven to be a fabricated lie told to the American people by Hillary Clinton and President Obama.  But also, sufficient knowledge of an impending attack was known at high levels of the White House and no additional security was not provided for the Benghazi compound.  A dereliction of action stating at the top of the Obama administration.

U.S. Media reluctant to expose the YouTube Lie.  What is astounding is that after the October 22 Select Committee meeting, the American media reported that Hillary was left unscathed and in fact gave a good account of why she promoted a YouTube story.  Hillary Clinton’s response to the many e-mail requests that highlighted the need for greater security from Ambassador Chris Stevens was that her security experts were highly capable and they had that responsibility.  Hillary’s response is a clear cop-out to place her ineptness on her subordinates and shows her failure to not only have known about the dangers imminent in Benghazi but that she failed to provide security backup. Her testimony confirmed that she could not accept it was her responsibility and that her spinning and excuses are reason to believe she is not trustworthy. The evidence revealed that she and President Obama lied to Americans by indicating the terror attack was due to a YouTube video - a distortion of the truth.

Conclusions on the October 22 Hearing. 

President Obama and then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton did not want to reveal that there was unrest and discontent in Libya; a truth concealed before the November 2012 presidential election.  This revelation would have been costly for President Obama just several weeks before the election because it would reveal his foreign policy was a failure.

The question arises as to why the Select Committee members on Benghazi were not more aggressive to reveal that Obama and Hillary lied to the American people?  Is it because it would be an embarrassment to the U.S. Government or it would be too much to present to the American people at this time; for it would cast a shadow of impeachment over the President and a disgraceful resignation in Hillary’s bid to be President of the United States.

The Tom Fitton report clearly indicates both President Obama and Hillary Clinton were negligent or inept to protect the Americans in Benghazi.  The prime motive for their inaction had to be the continued lie of a strong or normalized foreign policy in Libya several weeks prior to the presidential election.  Will Americans “see” the dishonesty in Obama and Hillary and demand his impeachment and her removal from any attempt to attain the presidency? 

The outcome or resolution of the Obama-Clinton deceit perpetrated on the American public will depend on the integrity and honesty of the American news media and the Select Committee on Benghazi to reveal the truth and nothing but the truth.

The October 22 Benghazi Committee Hearing revealed that it consists as a dysfunctional group because the Democratic members are not intent on seeking the truth by pursuing facts that may indicate Hillary Clinton was culpable for not providing the safety of Benghazi personnel.  It was obvious to see that Hillary was smiling and at ease when questioned by democratic committee members but was very guarded and serious when questioned by the republican members.  Hillary knew that the democratic committee members were stanch supporters to help clear the allegation that she was an inept Secretary of State that did not fulfill her responsibility to insure the safety of Benghazi personnel.

Even if President Obama did not originate the YouTube story, he approved it and publically announced it to the American public.  Only two weeks after the Benghazi attack, President Obama continued denouncing the distasteful YouTube video about the prophet Muhammad at a UN General Assembly, on September 25, 2012.  President Obama announced to the U.N. members, “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” As president of all Americans from many different ethnic and religious persuasions why should he be concerned with the prophet of Islam being slandered?  One would expect a Muslim Leader not the President of the United States to announce such a threat to those that slander the prophet of Islam.

For an American president to focus on the Islamic religion and a Muslim prophet reveals he has a strong affinity for Islam and the Muslim people. Two weeks after the YouTube video was still an issue, Obama announced the threat to UN representatives and governments around the world that a “future does not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”  Obama’s affinity for the Muslim people and the Islamic religion is prevalent today as he will not associate Muslim terrorism with an Islamic ideology but publically state Islam is a religion of peace.

The Sad Reality of Today

It is a sad observation to learn that both democrats and republicans cannot work together to reveal facts that clearly lead to the same conclusions because of party allegiances and ideology rather than what is best for the American people.  It has become evident that our top representatives in government will discard truth and integrity to protect their interests.  The morality and truthfulness that is needed to keep America strong and be the greatest country on earth has reached a new low.  The lack of integrity stems from the poor education provided to our youth whereby respect and honor for the truth is not taught. Have Americans come to accept lies by their leaders or are many poorly uneducated and can easily be made fools of?  To accept the YouTube lies by President Obama and Hillary Clinton is confirmation that America may be losing its most beautiful heritage as the land of opportunity for all people because its moral structure and high regard for truth has deteriorated.

Back to Nicholas Ginex Index
Back to Politics Index
Back to Islam Index

   
Support IPC
 
 
 
IPC operating since March 30, 2000
 
   
 
   
    Duplication of contents are allowed, only by naming the source & link to IPC
All rights are protected & reserved by Iran Politics Club © 2000 IPC