Qolabi (Fake Feces)
In March 1919,
Moscow launched a campaign to expose as
fraudulent the relics of saints. According to the Orthodox faith,
the bodies of saints do not decompose after death. Russian churches
& monasteries displayed elaborate coffins said to contain
preserved remains of saints. When opened on orders of the regime,
they turned out to contain either bare skeletons or dummies. These
disclosures damaged the prestige of the church among the better
educated. On simple people they seemed to have produced the
opposite effect, reinforcing their faith by giving rise to tales
wonderful mysteries. "Baryshnia", an old peasant explained
American visitor, "our holy saints disappeared to heaven
substituted rags & straw for their relics when they found
tombs were to be desecrated by nonbelievers. it was a great miracle."
This is an absolutely brilliant example
of how stupid pee-pole can become with
religious mumbo jumbo. But, yet again, Miranians did even better:
see their Imam's ass on the moon! Such intelligent pee-pole only
deserve the best!
Russia was struck by famine & by March 1922, over 30
million people were suffering hunger or actually starving. Various
private initiatives were organized to help the famine victims.
quickly disposed of such private initiatives, dissolving the committee
& arresting its members. Lenin, who even as a youth of 22
opposed giving humanitarian help to starving peasants in the Volga
region during the 1892 famine, had no interest in saving peasants'
lives. But he pretended to care in order to force the church into
position of both un-Christian callousness & defiance of the
ordering it do something he knew it could not do, namely turn
consecrated vessels for sale to aid victims of the famine.
So the stupid Russian people could only
blame themselves for what happened.
They forgot what Lenin did & failed to see what an asshole
he was. But most of
the blame here goes to the intelligentsia, who were lusting for
power, not the
pee-pole who were too stupid to know any better.
Miran, Goh intellectuals in Jendeyeh Melli, specially the Goh
should have known that a KK Mullahs like Khomeini, who had Kasravi
could never ever give anybody democracy! They should've read his
having sex with animals being OK, but maybe this is what made
them like that KK,
they did were used to having sex with animals!
in a culture where, Marxists & fanatic shit-Muslims could
merge into 1 group,
anything can happen!
wanted not relief for the hungry but a pretext for breaking
the church. In the town of Shuia, worshipers put to flight communist
officials who tried to raid the local church. 3 days later, these
officials returned in the company of troops equipped with machine
guns & soldiers opened fire on the crowd. Lenin seized on
events in Shuia as justification for an all-out attack on the
hierarchy. In a top secret memorandum, dictated over the phone
sent to the politburo with instructions that no copies be made,
spelled out how the famine & the resistance of the church
confiscation of vessels could be exploited to serve the government's
economic & political ends. "... it is now & only
now, when in the
regions afflicted by the famine there is cannibalism & the
littered with hundreds if not thousands of corpses, that we can
therefore must) pursue the acquisition of(church) valuables with
the most ferocious & merciless energy, stopping at nothing
suppressing all resistance.... In this way we shall assure ourselves
of capital worth several hundred million gold rubles ....All considerations
indicate that later on we will not succeed, because no other moment
except that of desperate hunger will offer us such a mood among
broad peasant masses, which will either assure us of their sympathy,
or, at any rate, their neutrality in the sense that victory in
for the removal of the valuables will remain unconditionally &
completely on our side.... the politburo will give detailed instructions
to the judiciary authorities that the trial of the Shuia rebels
opposed help to the starving should be conducted with maximum
swiftness & end with the execution of a very large number
of the most
influential & dangerous black hundreds of Shuia & several
Wow, what a MJ Lenin was!
Only to be matched by KK Khomeini in Miran. He must have said
When he planned the burning of people in a cinema to blame the
to capitalize on the famine, for which his agrarian
policies were largely responsible & which claimed millions
to discredit & break the Church &, along with it, what
was left of
the bourgeoisie. The wealth extorted from the church in this manner
was to be used not for famine relief, but for the political &
needs of the regime. The American Relief Admin, which 6 months
took charge of aid to the starving Russians, contended that there
no need for additional funds to purchase food since ARA already
more food & supplies at all parts & on all the lines leading
than the soviet transportation could handle.
Lenin ignored an offer made by the Vatican to redeem for any sum
required both catholic & orthodox church vessels slated for
Where were the Russian intellectuals? Why
didn't they do anything to stop Lenin?
Were they like Miranians, who all moved to Khaarej to have a good
I think this is another proof that there was no "revolution"
by brave & noble & united
people of Russia, coz if they had done it, they wouldn't put up
with KK Bolsheviks.
Just like Miran.
In March 1922,
Lenin was informed that the authorities had found in
the Kremlin museum Jewels estimated by experts to be worth at
300 million gold rubles. The soviet government was prepared in
1923 to sell some of this hoard to pay for German armaments.
Most of violence
against the clergy took the form of lynchings & arrests
by the security organs. Archbishop Andronik of Pern is said to
his cheeks hallowed, his ears & nose cut off, & his eye
disfigured he was driven through the city & then thrown into
the river to
When it comes to violence, Miranians are
very creative too.
They used to parade Bahai's with burning candles in holes made
in their bodies.
All arranged & invoked by the holy Mullahs of course.
evidence indicates that over 8000 persons were
executed or killed in the course of 1922 in the conflict over
& shocking thing was that these outrages were committed
by Russians, who were widely thought to have a deep attachment
church & that the population at large did not rise in protest:
record the fact that, in 1922, Russian orthodox soldiers plundered
at the bidding of a government consisting wholly of atheists &
Yes indeed, it was done by true no-bell
Russians. Just like in Miran, when the Mullahs
ridand-tu-din-va-keshvar, "the population at large did not
rise in protest". Miranians
didn't even care about their own God & religion, they just
sat back & watched & left the
country if they could. In fact, many who brought the curse to
power, deny any
responsibility for it & say "God will punish those Mullahs
who are corrupt", meaning
that they still think that the Mullahs should still rule the country
& that they have
no responsibility to ensure that the government of God is not
corrupt & filthy & actually
cares about the people. In fact one such Miranian was an American
citizen who kept
living in US till he became retired in mid 95, then he went back
to live in Miran coz
it was cheaper for him to do so. He was khaarej educated &
was/is fiercely pro KK
Khomeini & was/is actively involved in Shiit Islamic movement!
of Jewish involvement was exacerbated by the deliberate
Bolshevik policy in some instances of sending Jews to despoil
Maxim Groky wrote "I know of cases of young Jewish communists
purposely involved in the prosecution of the church in order that
philistine & the peasants should see: it is Jews that are
& mocking 'holy places'. It seems to me that this was done
partly from the
fear & partly from a clear intent to compromise the Jewish
people, It was
done by anti-Semites, of whom there are not a few among the communists".
against religious organizations was accompanied by
renewed drive against religious belief. The government launched
effort to discredit Christmas & the holidays of the other
religious celebrations were hastily staged in the major cities.
One witness said:
The population, & not only the faithful, looked upon this
carnival with dumb horror. there were no protests from the silent
street- the years of terror had done their work- but nearly everyone
tried to turn off the road when it met this shocking procession.
parade moved along empty streets & its attempts at creating
or provocation were met with dull silence on the part of the occasional
This was indeed the case is confirmed by the decision of the party
1923 to curtail such activities. A resolution demanded that atheists
refrain from offending the sensitivities of the believers since
only intensified 'religious fanaticism'.
Yes indeed, u can't hit the nail on it's
Many 'educated' Miranians don't even visit any sites that has
every now & then some
anti-Islamic articles. Many don't like the Mullahs but they still
don't even read anything
that would criticizes the Shiit Islam! Yet they don't see that
with their 'passivity' to the
filthy & criminal Mullahs' regime, they are partners to crime
against their own God!
tactic called for a split to be effected among the clergy.
The regime created & sponsored a splinter body known as the
"living church". its assembly hailed the Oct 1917 coup
as a "Christian
creation" for its struggle against capitalism, denied that
prosecuted the church & voted gratitude to Lenin for his role
leader" & "tribune of social truth".
As an analogue
of the living church, the regime created "Jewish
sections" (Evsektsii) of the Russian communist party. Their
was described as the destruction of traditional Jewish life, the
movement, & Hebrew culture.
disability imposed on Jews was the prohibition on the use
& teaching of Hebrew, the language of religious services but
the Zionist movement. By the mid 1920s Hebrew was outlawed.
Yidish, which the bundists of the Evsektsiia regarded as the true
speech of the masses, was declared the national language of Jews.
Of the 3 principal
religions represented in the soviet state, the Muslims
fared relatively the best. Their comparatively lenient treatment
entirely to political considerations, namely the fear of alienating
colonial nations whose support was critical to the strategy of
Comintern, since middle east Muslims were counted upon to undermine
imperialism. Sultan-Galiev cautioned Moscow that antireligious
propaganda among Muslims had to be conducted in a very circumspect
manner, not only because of their strong attachment to the faith
because they regarded the Muslim community as an "undivided
perceived an attack on one as an attack on all.
I don't agree with this that the "Muslim
community is an undivided whole".
Most Sunni Muslims laugh at the Shiit Muslims & openly criticize
I've seen Shiit Muslims making a fool of themselves, & be
laughed it, in Makkah.
Not to mention the hatred & animosity between Sunni &
Shiit Muslims in Iraq.
In the rural
districts, religious rituals were universally observed. Ignoring
soviet legislation, the peasants insisted on regarding as legitimate
marriages performed by a priest.
in 1920 was fully restored & perhaps even exceeded the old
, pre-Revolutionary one.
Wow, it seems that the gaav/olaaq actually
need their religion.
Maybe this is why many Miranians can't even imagine criticizing
not even after their holy clergy turns out to be filthy corrupt
killers. They would
just say that their God will punish the bad Mullahs & keep
on believing the shit
they were taught as kids.
The only thing
the Bolsheviks had achieved was to loosen the hierarchy
& split the church.
When in March
1921, confronting economic collapse & massive rebellions,
Lenin felt compelled to make a radical turnabout in economic policy
resulting in significant concessions to private enterprise, a
course that came
to be known as the New Economic Policy (NEP), it was widely believed
in the country & abroad that the Russian revolution, too,
had run its course
& entered its Thermidorian phase.
was the month of July in the French revolution calendar when
Jacobin rule came to an abrupt end, yielding to a more moderate
o the Marxists the term symbolized the triumph of the counterrevolution.
last 2 years of his conscious life, Lenin repeatedly had to
defend the NEP & insist that the revolution was on course.
Deep in his
heart, however, he was haunted by a sense of defeat. The attempt
build communism in a country as backward as Russia, he realized,
been premature, & had to be postponed until the requisite
cultural foundations were in place. Nothing went as planned: "the
out of control," he let slip once, "a man drives &
the car does not go
where he steers it, but where it is steered by something illegal,
unlawful, something that comes from God knows where". "on
economic front, with the attempt of transition to communism, we
suffered by the spring of 1921 a defeat that was more serious
inflicted on us by Kolchak, Denikin, or Pilsudski, far more serious,
more basic & dangerous". It was an admission that he
mistaken in insisting as early as the 1890s that Russia was fully
& ready for socialism.
war had to some extent shielded the communists from the
unpopularity of their policies by making it possible to justify
except for its own cadres, the Bolshevik regime had the
whole country against it, & even the cadres were rebelling.
himself described the Bolsheviks as but a drop of water in the
sea. And the sea was raging.
Wow, yet they managed to brainwash so many
that the Russian people made a
popular "revolution". What is amazing to me is that
most Miranians have not
approved of the Mullahs' regime for over 20 years, but haven't
done anything to
remove it. Bless the Masters for helping the KIR on top to rule
for so many years.
the mutineers to surrender at once & to throw
themselves on the mercy of the government; the alternative was
retribution. With minor changes, his ultimatum could have been
by a tsarist governor-general. One appeal to the rebels threatened
if they continued resistance they would be "shot like partridges".
ordered the mutineers' wives & children residing in Petrograd
to be taken
hostage. Annoyed with the insistence of the head of the Petrograd
that the Kronshtadt rebellion was spontaneous, he asked Moscow
The day after
the 1st shots had been fired, the Izvestiia of the Provisional
revolutionary committee of Kronshtadt published a statement, "what
are fighting for," calling for a "third revolution".
"in carrying out the October revolution, the working class
hoped to achieve
its liberation. The outcome has been even greater enslavement
beings. Power has passed from a monarchy based on the police &
gendarmerie into the hands of usurpers-communists-who have given
toilers not freedom but the daily dread of ending up in the torture
of the Cheka, the horror of which exceeds many times the rule
I'm lost for words here!
So not all Russians were gaav/olaaq, but they still couldn't beat
the KK Bolsheviks.
Tambov at the beginning of May, Tukhachevskii assembled
a force which at the height of the operation numbered over 100,000
Assisting the red army were "international units" of
Hungarian & Chinese
volunteers. Tukhachevskii realized that he confronted not only
force-thousands of guerrillas- but also a hostile population of
It was decided to conduct all operations in a cruel manner so
very nature of the actions(taken) would command respect.
KK Khomeini really believed in this rule
& Mullahs loved it & butchered non stop
for a long time. All the times bullshitting that Miranians did
revolution coz the old regime
was "cruel". None of the Goh opposition groups admitted
that the old regime was an
angle compared to the KK Mullahs. They all kept on bullshitting
about the cruelty of the
old regime on & on & on. To justify their Goh Khori &
to this strategy was good intelligence. Using paid informers,
the Cheka obtained lists of the partisans: a special directive
families to be held as hostages. Using these lists, to which it
names of peasants designated "kulaks", the Cheka herded
hostages into concentration camps especially built for the purpose.
Yes indeed, Miranians turned into informers
by the thousands. If they didn't like their
neighbor, they'd just call him taaquti or Savaki & hey presto
the neighbor was
'eliminated' & they could take over his house or his stuff.
his associates believed that problems were caused by people,
& that one solved them by getting rid troublemakers.
Just like KK Khomeini who had Kasravi killed,
never thinking that eventually others
will see the big picture & will start questioning the Shiit
the task of the judiciary was to provide a principled &
politically correct (& not merely narrowly juridical)....
justification of terror...The court is not to eliminate terror...
substantiate it & legitimize it in principle.
How could the Russian culture create such
a MJ & asshole "creature"?!
How could the Russian intellectuals support such an asshole?
on combat: political warfare was his true metier. To
pursue it, he required enemies. Having been twice defeated-first
failing to spread communism abroad, & then by failing to construct
socialist economy at home-he now turned his energies to fighting
imaginary foes. The enemies he selected for repression were "guilty"
not by virtue of anything they had done or even intended to do,
because by the mere fact of their existence they defied the revolutionary
order. The principal victims of his wrath were the clergy &
numerous reports of the hunger-maddened killing & eating
neighbors & even their own. Nansen visited Russia & spoke
cannibalism as a phenomenon spreading to a terrific degree.
The famine was accompanied by epidemics, which ravaged bodies
weakened by hunger. The main killer was typhus, but hundreds of
thousands also fell victim to cholera, typhoid fever & smallpox.
In the 1891-92 famine, when 12.5 million peasants were afflicted
hunger, tsarist authorities moved quickly & effectively &
supplies to be delivered to 11 million victims & supplied
emergency aid to local governments. As a result the number of
were 1/13 of those suffered by the starving under the Bolsheviks.
In none of
Lenin's writings or speeches of that period can one find one
word of sympathy for the millions of his subjects who were perishing
from hunger. Indeed, it has been suggested that the famine was
not unwelcome politically because it so weakened the peasantry
wiped out any likelihood of peasant resistance & pacified
even more rapidly than did the repeal of food requisitioning.
approval, Gorky issued an appeal "to all honorable
people" soliciting food & medicines. A group of civic
"Pomgol", a public committee to aid the hunger. It had
including Gorky. Gorky on behalf of the soviet government accepted
offer of help from the American Relief admin. ARA spent 61.6 million
dollars on Russian relief. But Lenin made short shrif of Pomgol:
used it as a go-between to avoid the embarrassment of having to
help from the "imperialist" enemy. Lenin asked Stalin
to demand the
immediate dissolution of Pomgol & the imprisonment or exile
leaders, on the ostensible grounds of unwillingness to work. He
further ordered that the press be directed in a hundred ways to
ridicule & badger its members at least once a week for 2 months.
Once the American
& other foreign organizations assumed the principal
responsibilities for feeding starving soviet citizens, Moscow
its resources to other purposes. Three days after an agreement
Hoover/ARA, Litvinov informed Moscow that he had sold to an English
party Jewels worth 20 million gold rubles & that the buyer
to purchase additional Jewels for the value of 20 million pounds-
exceeding the combined US & European donations to starving
Russians. Trotsky instructed the soviet agent in Germany, in strictest
secrecy, to place orders for rifles & machine guns worth 10
gold rubles. At the very same time the soviet government was relying
on western charity to feed its people, it was offering foodstuffs
abroad. In the fall of 1922, Moscow made it known that it had
of tons of cereals available for export- this at a time when its
estimates indicated that during the coming winter 8 million soviet
would still require food assistance.
There was no limit to their M-Jendegi.
Mind u, they did all this in the name of "Brotherhood of
Who was worst, Bolsheviks, or the Mullahs who claimed to be the
merciful God's representatives?
provided the German army with a sanctuary in which to
build & test advanced weapons in exchange for some of this
& the training of the red army in their use. This collaboration
until Sept 1933, 9 months after Hitler came to power.
Lenin formally requested the German army to help reorganize the
army in March 1921.
it was essential to keep the Allies & Germany at daggers
drawn, & to this end it found the Versailles treaty a perfect
of the German communists(KPD) now opened its pages
to Nationalists; Nazis spoke at communist rallies & communists
Nazi ones. The KPD put on posters that blended the swastika with
the red star. The Spartacist, Ruth Fischer, herself Jewish, exhorted
German students to trample & hang Jewish capitalists. This
collaboration ended in Aug 1923, when the Nazis pulled out.
the new prime minister, Gustav Stresemann, from realizing
his policy of negotiating with the Allied powers for financial
& for an easing of the Versailles terms, the Politburo decided
1923, to overthrow his government. Hoping to take advantage of
wave of strikes that broke out at the time in Germany, Trotsky
dispatched there a military mission to organize the coup. One
tons of grain were stockpiled in Petrograd & at frontier points
the Germans withstand an anticipated Allied blockade; a relief
200 million gold rubles was also set aside. Trotsky discussed
revolutionary tactics with German communists, on whose advice
decided to begin the coup in Saxony. But German workers failed
respond to revolutionary appeals & the coup, which was concurrent
with the right-wing Kapp putsch, failed miserably. From Nov 1923
Mar 1924 the German communist party was outlawed.
agreed to let Germany produced weapons prohibited by
the Versailles treaty on Russian territory in facilities financed
leaders, & no one more than Lenin, fretted about the
progressive bureaucratization of their regime. The more the bureaucracy
expanded, the more of the budget it absorbed, the less got done.
never occurred to the Bolsheviks that "power" of which
they never had enough, meant not only opportunity but also responsibility;
that the fulfillment of that responsibility was a full-time occupation
for correspondingly large cadres of professionals; & that
professionals were unlikely to be concerned exclusively or even
with public welfare but would also attend to their own needs.
bureaucratization of life that accompanied communist rule opened
unprecedented opportunities for clerical careers to lower-middle-class
elements previously barred from them: they were its principal
... the peasantry,
the working class, the armed forces ... now make up
the huge "soviet bureaucracy"- this new urban stratum,
in its essence
& ambitions a petty bourgeoisie, all of whose interests bind
it to the
revolution, because it alone enabled them to climb to where they
freed of hard productive labor & involved in the mechanism
administration, rising above the nation's masses.
By the time
the civil war ended, the communist party had a sizeable
staff occupied exclusively with paperwork. Only 21% of the members
engaged in physical labor in industry or agriculture; the remaining
held various white-color positions. The members' educational level
was exceedingly low & not commensurate with their responsibilities
& authority: in 1922, only 0.6%(2316) had completed higher
& 6.4% (24318) had secondary school diplomas.
...92.7% of party members were functionally semiliterate(18000
4.7%, were completely illiterate). from the body of white-color
personnel emerged an elite of functionaries employed in Moscow
the central organs of the communist party. In 1922, this group
numbered over 15000 persons.
undoubtedly were communists who joined the party
for idealistic reasons, the majority did so for the advantages
bestowed. Members enjoyed privileges that in the 19 century had
associated with gentry status, namely, assured access to executive
positions in government. Trotsky labeled them "radishes"
white inside). From the beginning of it reign, the communist party's
as an entity above the law transferred also to its membership.
power, combined with legal immunity, inevitably led to abuses.
Communist bosses behaved like 18 century owners of serfs.
Many Miranians became very rich & powerful
overnight by joining the KIR regime.
Many qaaltaaq & laat kids joined the Basij & ruled with
They all ruled with terror in God's own name.
1917 & the middle of 1921, the number of government
employees increased nearly fivefold, from 576000 to 2.4 million.
the country had over twice as many bureaucrats as workers.
immense need for officials & the low educational level of
own cadres, the new regime had no choice but to hire large number
ex-tsarist officials, especially personnel qualified to run ministerial
The new bureaucracy modeled itself on the tsarist. As before 1917,
officials served the state, not the nation, which they viewed
as a hostile force.
Russia in 1920 & reported: ... gatherings of worn, tired
people, looking hungry & apathetic. The corridors & offices
with applicants seeking permission to do or to be exempt from
or that. .... Workers & peasants, their heads bared, approach
tables. Respectfully, even servilely, they seek information, plead
"order" for clothing, or a "ticket" for boots.
"I don't know," "in the next
office," "come tomorrow," is the usual reply. There
are protests &
lamentations, & begging for attention & advice.
In the summer
of 1920 the communist party was shaken by a heresy the
party establishment designated the "Workers' Opposition".
were Bolsheviks, who accepted the dictatorship of the party &
nothing wrong with the party's treatment of the peasantry. But
it unacceptable that the intelligentsia, formed into a new bureaucracy,
displacing labor as the country's ruling class. For indeed, the
"worker" government had not a single worker in a position
most of its leading officials had not only never worked in a factory
a farm, but had never even held a steady job.
Lenin denounced the WO as a species of the Menshevism & syndicalism
& counterattacked & crushed it in no time. But in so doing
recourse to procedures that destroyed, once & for all, what
was left of
democracy in communist ranks.
In March 1921,
Kollanti released for internal party use a brochure in
which she assailed the regime's bureaucratization. The WO, she
made up exclusively of laboring men & women, felt that the
leadership had lost touch with labor... This happened because
apparatus had been taken over by class enemies who despised communism:
the petty bourgeoisie had seized control of the bureaucracy, while
"grand bourgeoisie", in the guise of "specialists",
had taken over industrial
management & the military command.
the 9th party congress pass a resolution forbidding trade unions
to interfere with management. He justified such procedures with
argument that under communism, which had eliminated the exploiting
classes, trade unions no longer had to defend the interests of
since this was done for them by the government.
Khomeini only banned & punished the very few 'good' Mullahs,
who dared to oppose
him. He had no problem doing this & the mass gaav/olaaq were
passive as usual.
confronted Lenin & his associates with a problem:
how to govern in the name of the "proletariat" when
turned its back on them. One solution was to denigrate Russia's
class. it was now often heard that the "true" workers
had given their lives
in the civil war & that their place had been taken by social
of dealing with the challenge was to interpret the
"proletariat" as an abstraction: in this view, the party
was by definition
the "people" & acted on their behalf no matter what
the living people
thought they wanted.
that it was not possible to entrust the management of the
economy to workers, if only because there were hardly any communists
among them ... In other words, one could have either communism
dictatorship of the proletariat") or worker rule, but not
spelled the doom of communism. Bukharin explicitly acknowledged
communism could not be reconciled with democracy.
KK Khomeini said that democracy would lead
I suppose the credit should go to the Goh Baazargaan.
The 1st symptoms
of Lenin's illness appeared in 1921. In March 1922,
he delivered a rambling speech attacking anyone who disagreed
subjecting some of his closest associates to ridicule. Observing
motions, lapses of memory, & occasional speech difficulties,
now concluded that he was suffering from a more serious malady,
progressive paralysis, for which there was no cure & which
was bound to
end before long in total incapacitation & death. He began
preparations for an orderly transfer of authority. This was for
him a very
painful task, not only because he loved power above all else,
because he thought no one was truly qualified to inherit his mantle.
At the time,
Trotsky, the "organizer of victory" as Radek called
seemed the natural hair. But he had much going against him. He
joined the Bolshevik party late, on the eve of the Oct coup, after
Lenin & his followers for years to ridicule & criticism.
The old guard never
forgave him for his past & he remained an outsider to the
circle. He was widely disliked for arrogance & lack of tact.
to Lenin's sister, Trotsky could not control his temper &
one meeting of the Politburo called Lenin a "hooligan".
white as chalk, but made no reply.
The key to
Stalin's rising power was the combination of functions vested
in him as member of the Orgburo & chairman of the secretariat.
command, officials could be promoted, relocated, or dismissed.
Stalin used not only to eliminate anyone who challenged the judgment
the central committee, as Lenin wanted, but to appoint functionaries
personally loyal to him. To make certain nothing escaped his attention,
Stalin required provincial party secretaries to report to him
once a month. Stalin acquired unrivaled knowledge of party affairs
to their lowest levels ..... he withheld this information from
his potential rivals.
Stalin with powers that he himself 6 months later would
characterize as boundless. By then it would be too late to curb
not anticipate that as a result of the regime he had introduced,
Russia would come under one-man rule. He thought that impossible.
1919, in a personal exchange with the Menshevik historian, who
expressed such fears, he wrote:
as concerns "personal dictatorship", if you pardon the
expression, it is utter
nonsense. The apparatus has grown altogether gigantic-in some
excessive. And under these conditions, a personal dictatorship
is in general
To a detached
observer the problems that troubled Lenin & jeopardized his
revolution appear embedded in the premises of his regime.
of the dream the Bolsheviks had built up an immense &
centralized machine of power to which they then gradually surrendered
more & more of their dreams: proletarian democracy, the rights
nations, & finally their own freedom. They could not dispense
if they were to strive for the fulfillment of their ideals; but
now their power
came to oppress & overshadow their ideals.
I think the KIR regime was different.
The Goh Mullahs thought they knew it all, coz they were representing
God. So their
dream was to gain POWER & F* the hell out of the people &
the country. But gradually
those people, who were stupid enough to think that Shiit Islam
would provide salvation
for the country & the economy & turn Miran into behesht,
started to see that the Shiit
Islam could not deliver! Like u just can't run the country without
banks & Mullahs
making money from "interests" on loans. So they gradually
started to accept "corruption"
of rules & the "kolaaye shar'i" that the Mullahs
came up with (as they had done for
centuries). The Mullahs just kept on brainwashing people &
killing all oppositions, while
moving money out of the country into their Swiss banks.
those stupid intellectuals who had supported the KIR, had to keep
about how cruel the old regime had been. But they could never
explain how they did a
revolution to gain freedom & democracy, but ended up with
a regime so oppressive &
corrupt & criminal & incompetent (bad enough to destroyed
the economy & almost
losing the whole country in a war), that it didn't make any sense
a brilliant game that deceived everyone, from Lenin down.
He would take on himself essential jobs that no one else wanted:
drudgeries involving the flow of paper ... He always claimed to
the good of the party uppermost in mind. He seemed devoid of personal
ambitions & vanity, quite content to let Trotsky & few
others bask in
the public limelight. At his country dacha, Stalin would gather
party's leaders, sometimes with their wives & children, to
matters of substance but also to reminisce, sing & dance.
did or said suggested that underneath his amiable exterior lurked
murder. Like a predator mimicking harmless insects, he insinuated
himself into the midst of his unsuspecting prey.
I wonder how much the opposition leaders
of 78 knew about how KK Khomeini
was bent on killing & cruelty? Surely, by 78 he had already
shown his hands by
having Kasravi killed, so they couldn't say "we didn't know",
it was their job
to know these things. Besides, the issue was not just Khomeini,
but the rule of the
Mullahs, who were really hated by the educated people & had
very bad reputation in
Miran, so they must've known. Perhaps, once they saw the Masters
giving the green
light, their goal was to get rid of the old regime & sorts
things out later.
bureaucratic defeat(Trotsky persuaded the party to adopt
Lenin's position on some issue), & the specter of a Lenin-Trotsky
alliance, alarmed the triumvirate: their political survival demanded
Lenin's complete insulation from government affairs. On Dec 18,
day Trotsky won his victory, Stalin & Kamenev obtained from
a mandate giving Stalin authority over Lenin's health regimen.
critical clause .... read: to place on comrade Stalin personal
responsibility for the isolation of Vladimir Ilich both in respect
personal contacts with communist workers & correspondence.
to Stalin's instructions, Lenin was to work only at brief intervals,
to dictate to secretaries, one of whom was Stalin's wife. It was
astonishing measure, which treated Lenin & his wife as mentally
Feeling ensnared by a web of intrigue, at the heart of which he
increasingly to suspect Stalin, Lenin turned for help to Trotsky,
was in a similar predicament.
On Dec 21,
apparently distrusting his secretaries, Lenin dictated to his
wife Krupskaia a warm note to Trotsky, congratulating him on
winning the battle over the foreign trade monopoly ... The contents
this note were at once communicated to Stalin, who now had
confirmation of his suspicion that Lenin & Trotsky were joining
against him. The next day he telephoned Krupskaia, berating her
crudely for having transcribed her husband's dictation in violation
the regimen he had established under the party's authority, &
threatening her with an investigation by the central control commission.
After hanging up, she fell into hysterics, crying & rolling
floor. She wrote that in all her years as party member no one
spoken to her as Stalin had done. That night before she could
of the incident, he suffered yet another stroke.
the pretense of safeguarding his health, Stalin & his
associates in effect placed Lenin under house arrest.
I'm speechless again!
Some "revolution", hah?
He built a system to butcher people & starve millions to death
in the name of
"brotherhood of mankind", but the system ended up treating
him like a mad-man,
which he was, putting him under house arrest & at the same
time parade him around like
had a curious echo 30 years later. In the fall of 1952
Stalin's physician found him unwell & urged that he immediately
all work. Stalin, probably mindful of precedent, ordered him arrested.
paying dearly for his political habits. For 20 years he had
dominated his associates; but now they had tasted power, &
with impatience to be on their own. They justified what amounted
quiet coup d'etat in a whispered campaign within party circles
"old man" was out of touch & even something of a
Trotsky disloyally joined in this campaign.
for Pravda an article intended for the forthcoming party
congress, in which he voiced anxiety over the possibility of a
the party & suggested ways of averting it. ... At the same
leadership sent a confidential circular to the provincial &
organizations intended to neutralize the article's potentially
effect. The letter drafted by Trotsky & signed by all the
the politburo, including Stalin, advised that Lenin was unwell
to participate in Politburo meetings. This explained why he did
realize that, in fact, there was not the slightest risk of a split
party. Had he known of this document, Lenin might well have echoed
the words Nicholas II had written in his diary after being forced
abdicate: "all around treason & cowardice & deception!".
Lenin fought back like a cornered animal. ... he planned to intervene
with Trotsky's help ... Trotsky was his natural ally in this endeavor,
for he too was politically isolated. Had Lenin succeeded, Stalin's
career would have been seriously set back, if not ruined.
a Georgian & spoke Russian with a comic foreign accent!
I bet he wasn't really respected for this
in his early days.
How strange that the KK Imam had a comic accent too, which must've
many intellectuals that now their own ruler was a dehaati Mullaayeh
Credit goes to the Masters who pulled it off.
so betrayed by his associates that during the 13 months he
had left to live he categorically refused to see any of them,
only indirectly, through his secretarial staff. During 1923 he
Trotsky nor Stalin, all were kept away on his explicit orders.
separation from his closest associates resembled the decision
of Nicholas II,
in the last months of his reign, to break off relations with the
To me this is just poetic justice.
Stalin, having become general secretary, had accumulated
unbounded power, I'm not convinced that he will always know how
use this power ... Stalin is too coarse & this shortcoming,
within our midst & in our relations, as communists, becomes
in the post of general secretary. For this reason I suggest the
consider how to transfer Stalin from this post ...
Lenin thus fathomed only Stalin's minor vices, flaws & conduct
temperament: his sadistic cruelty, his megalomania, his hatred
superior, eluded him to the end.
I think too much is made of the MJ Lenin,
he wasn't smart at all. Author uses
the term "eluded him" as if Lenin was so smart but missed
to see this part.
MJ did too much damage to his country & many parts of the
his EGO in lust for power & got millions killed in the name
of "brotherhood of
mankind". There was nothing smart about it. What do the Russians
have to show
for it now?
What do the idiot Miranians have to show for it after over 25
years of nightmare?
Economic or any other sort of prosperity?
Any form of social-justice & fairness in the society?
Lack of corruption?
Good education or health?
They have F* all!
But what would the Mullahs have to show for it 50 years from now?
Coz, when the Masters bring down the Mullahs, which it has to
happen, the whole
hell will break loose & Miranians will butcher Mullahs &
their families & the
Mullahs couldn't even take refuge outside Miran, coz they are
hated by millions of
Miranians scattered all over the world.
So Khomeini's jendeh daughter could go around telling people "Imam
women shouldn't wear colorful cloths" but it won't work.
Miranians maybe gaav/olaaq,
but they are not that stupid. Once the KIR falls, the "truth
will set them free".
Lenin confided he was "preparing a bomb" against Stalin
at the 12 party congress. Stalin was fighting for his political
positioned though he was, once Lenin personally took the filed,
no chance. His one hope was that Lenin would be fully incapacitated
before he could bring him down.
found from his wife how Stalin had spoken to her the
previous December, he dictated a letter to Stalin:
you had the rudeness to telephone my wife & abuse her. Although
she has told you of her willingness to forget what you have said...
I have no intention of forgetting so easily what is done against
needless to say, I consider whatever is done against my wife to
directed also against myself. For this reason I request you to
me whether you agree to retract what you have said & apologize,
prefer a breach of relations between us.
He was as kineh'i as KK Imam!
But considering that the F*ing Imam was supposed to represent
a merciful God,
Imam was far worst than Lenin.
A few days
later, Lenin suffered a massive stroke, which robbed him of
the power of speech. For all practical purposes he was a living
for although he seemed to understand what was said to him &
was able to
read, he could not communicate. In this last period of his life,
seemed to have been overwhelmed by a sense of failure. It was
by an uncharacteristic craving for praise, for reassurance that
whatever the outcome, he had made history.
himself from criticism for having refused Lenin's
offer of deputyship. Although his Jewish origins held for him
meaning, he said, it was politically significant. By assuming
post Lenin offered him, he would "give enemies ground for
the country was ruled by a Jew". Lenin had dismissed the
"nonsense" but "deep in his heart he agreed with
to the dangers of totalitarianism only when it threatened
him personally: his sudden conversion to party democracy was a
of self-defense, not the championship of principle. The record
that in his day, Trotsky, too, was one of the pack. His defeat
ennobling about it. He lost because he was outsmarted in a sordid
for political power.
on Jan 21, 1924.
Lenin had expressed the wish to be buried by the side of his mother
Petrograd. But the party's masters had other ideas. They needed
physical Lenin on permanent exhibit to cater to the popular belief,
in orthodox religion, that the remains of saints were immune to
None of them, except their common enemy Trotsky, was widely known.
Stalin was hardly a household name. A dead, & therefore mute
corporeal, Lenin, suitably preserved, would provide validation
of the faith
he had founded & provide continuity between the October revolution
the rule of his successors. Stalin delivered a funeral speech
with a "pledge"
in which, using religious cadences he had learned in the seminary,
vowed in the name of the party faithfully to carry out Lenin's
By March, the corpse began to decompose. Krasin, placed in charge
the funeral arrangements, believed in resurrection & suggested
corpse be frozen: special apparatus for this purpose was imported
Germany, but the idea had to be dropped as impractical. After
discussions, Vorobev was entrusted with the task of embalming
was removed & transferred to the Lenin institute, where
scientists were assigned to discover the secret of his "genius"
& to prove
that it represented a "higher stage in the evolution of mankind".
heart was deposited in the Lenin museum.
In 1939, Stalin
assigned 22 scientists to a laboratory to oversee the mummy,
which, despite precautions, did not remain stable. The most advanced
scientific methods were applied to prevent further decay or changes
Thus the Bolsheviks
who 5 years earlier in a noisy campaign of blasphemy
& ridicule exposed as sham the relics of orthodox saints,
created a holy
relic of their own. Unlike the church's saints, whose remains
to be nothing but rags & bones, their god, as befitted the
age of science,
was composed of alcohol, glycerin & formalin.
The communist God composed of "alcohol, glycerin & formalin",
What a poetic justice!
revolution of 1917 was not an event or even a process, but a
sequence of disruptive & violent acts that occurred more or
but involved actors with differing & in some measure contradictory
It began as a revolt of the most conservative elements in Russian
disgusted by the crown's familiarity with Rasputin & the mismanagement
the war effort. From conservatives the revolt spread to the liberals,
challenged the monarchy from fear that if it remained in office,
would become inevitable. In Feb 1917, when the Petrograd garrison
to fire on civilian crowds, the generals, in agreement with parliamentary
politicians, hoping to prevent the mutiny from spreading to the
convinced Tsar to abdicate.
neither social discontent nor the agitation of the radical
intelligentsia played any significant role in these events, both
moved to the
forefront the instant imperial authority collapsed. In the spring
peasants began to seize & distribute among themselves noncommunal
properties. Next the rebellion spread to frontline troops, who
droves to share in the spoils; to workers, who took control of
enterprises; & to ethnic minorities, but the cumulative effect
of their assault
on the country's social & economic structure by the autumn
of 1917 created
in Russia a state of anarchy.
Trust stupid pee-pole caring more about
"sharing the spoils" than their own
country & future!
empire was a fragile artificial structure, held together by
mechanical links provided by the bureaucracy, police & army.
Its 150 million
inhabitants were bound neither by strong economic interests nor
by a sense
of national identity.
I think lack of "sense of nationality"
has been major factor in Miranian culture too.
Perhaps after centuries of invasion & looting & rape &
internal fighting amongst
the ruling families or tribes, they just stuck their heads in
the sand & learnt to care
only for their own families? But this is no excuse. They should
know by now that
when the country gets F*ed, they all get F*ed. Maybe they are
a bit "thick".
... certain weakness or lack of a strong cohesion or cementation
of elements which form a social compound. ... From political point
Russian state institutions lacked cohesion & amalgamation
masses over which they ruled ...
factors are taken into consideration, it becomes apparent that
the Marxist notion that revolution always results from social
cannot be sustained. Although such discontent did exist in imperial
it does everywhere, the decisive & immediate factors making
for the regime's
fall & the resultant turmoil were overwhelmingly political.
concessions made in 1905 to share power with society
neither made tsarism more popular with the opposition nor raised
in the eyes of the people at large, who simply could not understand
ruler would allow himself to be abused from the forum of a government
institution. the Confucian principle of ... Mandate of Heaven
... in Russia
derived from forceful conduct: a weak ruler, a "loser",
forfeited it. Nothing
could be more misleading than to judge a Russian head of state
standard of either morality or popularity: what mattered was that
fear in friends & foe-that, like Ivan IV, he deserved the
sobriquet of "awesome".
Nicholas II fell not because he was hated but because he was held
I think this is very true in Miran. Once
u show kindness to gaav/olaaq who are
used to being beaten up on daily basis by all those that can be
in any position of
authority, like police or any paper-pusher in bureaucracy or any
doorman, they will
see it as "weakness" & will immediately try to dominate
u! The damage in Miran was
done when the "student" protest was "organized"
when Shah visited Carter in US &
later, when people could go to tazaahorat without being shot at,
or when they could
do allaaho-akbar-baazi on their roofs & get away with it.
other factors making for revolution was the mentality of the Russian
peasantry, of a class never integrated into the political structure.
up 80% Russia's population. It is commonplace to hear that under
regime the Russian peasant was "oppressed", but it is
far from clear just
who was oppressing him. On the eve of the revolution, he enjoyed
& legal rights; he also owned, either outright or communally,
9/10 of the
country's agricultural land & the same proportion of livestock.
western European or American std, he was better off than his father,
than his grandfather, who more likely than not had been a serf.
.... he certainly
enjoyed greater security than tenant farmers of Ireland, Spain
Russian peasants was not oppression, but isolation.
They were too stupid to know they had it too good, so they got
sucked in &
fell for their MJ intelligentsia.
Miranians were too stupid to know who would oppress them worst,
opposition leaders only lusted for power to oppress pee-pole themselves
make their own families rich, even their own holy clergies.
knew no loyalty outside his household & commune. He felt
no patriotism & no attachment to the government ... He looked
the city & on men without beards: Marquis de Custine heard
it said as early
as 1839 that someday Russia would see a revolt of the bearded
shaven. The existence of this mass of alienated & potentially
peasants immobilized the government, which believed that it was
only from fear & would interpret any political concessions
as weakness &
Hell, the entire Goh culture of Miran "knew
no loyalty outside his household &
commune" & "felt no patriotism & no attachment
to the government". Anybody,
who could, would bribe & do anything to prevent his son to
do military service.
Logic never played a role in the culture, pee-pole tried to get
away with anything
they could, abusing anything or anybody they could, including
abusing their own
religion. Their holy Mullahs invented abuse of religion.
of serfdom & the social institutions of rural Russia
prevented the peasantry from developing qualities required for
citizenship. While serfdom was not slavery, the two institutions
this in common that like slaves, serfs had no legal rights &
sense of law. ... serfdom may have been worse than slavery in
serf had never known freedom, which prevented him from acquiring
qualities of a true citizen: in his opinion, it was a principal
of bolshevism. To serfs, authority was by its very nature arbitrary:&
defend themselves from it they relied not on appeals to legal
rights, but on cunning. They could not conceive of government
principle: life to them was a hobbesian war of all against all.
attitude fostered despotism: for the absence of inner discipline
respect for law required order to be imposed from the outside.
despotism ceased to be viable, anarchy ensued;& once anarchy
its course, it inevitably gave rise to a new despotism.
Yes indeed, gaav/olaaq brainwashed not-to-think
& follow-shit-religion & abused for
centuries can NOT become Civil overnight & have democracy!
workers were potentially destabilizing not because
they assimilated revolutionary ideologies-very few of them did
they were excluded from leadership positions in the revolutionary
parties. Rather, since most of them were one or at most two generations
removed from village & only superficially urbanized, they
them to the factory rural attitudes only slightly adjusted to
conditions. They were not socialists but syndicalists, believing
their village relatives were entitled to all the land, so they
had a right to
the factories. ... industrial labor in Russia was numerically
to play a major role in revolution: with at most 3 million workers(a
proportion of them peasants seasonally employed), they represented
mere 2% of the population.
who begun her revolutionary career in the 1870w &
lived to witness Lenin's dictatorship, acknowledged in 1918 the
responsibility of socialists for bolshevism in that they had goaded
&, one could add, peasants- to seize property, but taught
of citizens' obligations.
A major &
arguably decisive factor making for revolution was the intelligentsia,
which in Russia attained greater influence than anywhere else.
"ranking" system of the tsarist civil service excluded
outsiders from the
administration, estranging the best-educated elements & making
susceptible to fantastic schemes of social reform, conceived but
tried in western Europe. The absence until 1906 of representative
institutions & a free press, combined with the spread of education,
enabled the cultural elite to claim the right to speak on behalf
of a mute
people. There exists no evidence that the intelligentsia actually
the opinion of the "masses": on the contrary, the evidence
both before & after the revolution peasants & workers
intellectuals. ... But since the true will of the people had no
expression,...., the intelligentsia was able with some success
to pose as
The problem with Miran was that it didn't
have 'people', so "opinion of masses' did
not exist. Masses of gaav/olaaq didn't have 'opinion'. They had
never learnt to think
Miranian intellectuals looked down at the masses & called
them "ahmaq amaleh dehaati"
& called themselves doktor & mohandes, while using their
own people as slaves in
their homes as kolfat nokar. This was true even with people in
the tudeh party, who were
U must dominate others to prevent others from dominating u!
in Russia constituted itself into a caste:& since ideas were
what gave it identity & cohesion, it developed extreme intellectual
intolerance. ... Its stress on the inequities of the status quo
a device for gaining popular support: no rectification of these
would have persuaded radical intellectuals to give up their revolutionary
aspirations. Such beliefs linked members of various left-wing
which we have defined as intellectuals craving power,
stood in total & uncompromising hostility to the existing
the tsarist regime could do short of committing suicide would
it. They were revolutionaries not for the sake of improving the
of the people but for the sake of gaining domination over the
remaking them in their own image. They confronted the imperial
with a challenge that it had no way of repulsing short of employing
kind of methods introduced later by Lenin. Reforms, whether those
the 1860s, or those of 1905-06, only whetted the appetite of the
& spurred them to still greater revolutionary excesses.
Wow, this was very true in Miran.
Once the opposition leaders saw the green light for regime change,
they just went
crazy with lust for power, completely forgetting the 'country'.
Well, u could say
many never cared about the country anyway, coz they had been on
the payroll of
Masters for years. But the fact remains that when they saw the
green light & saw
that the old regime wasn't going to kill them, so they could get
away with it,
they all became shojaa ane-qollaabi! Nothing the old regime did
could save the day,
except for killing the ane-qollaabi-haa. So the old regime fell
because it was too kind
to kill its own people. But during the fall of KIR, Miranians
will see another difference
between the old & the new regime as far cruelty is concerned.
peasant demands & under direct assault from the radical
intelligentsia, the monarchy had only one means of averting collapse,
that was to broaden the base of its authority by sharing power
conservative elements of society. Historic precedent indicates
successful democracies have initially limited power-sharing to
orders; these eventually came under pressure from the rest of
population, with the result that their privileges turned into
rights. Involving conservatives, who were far more numerous than
the radicals, in both decision making & administration would
something of an organic bond between the government & society,
the crown of support in the event of upheavals, &, at the
isolating the radicals. Such a course was urged on the monarchy
far-sighted officials & private individuals. It should have
in the 1860s, at the time of the great reforms, but it was not.
finally compelled in 1905 by a nationwide rebellion to concede
parliament, the monarchy no longer had this option available,
combined liberal & radical opposition forced it to concede
close to a democratic franchise. This resulted in the conservatives
the Duma being submerged by militant intellectuals & anarchist
In sum, while
the collapse of tsarism was not inevitable, it was made
likely by deep-seated cultural & political flaws that prevented
regime from adjusting to the economic & cultural growth of
flaws that proved fatal under the pressures generated by WWI.
possibility of such adjustment existed, it was aborted by the
a belligerent intelligentsia bent on toppling the government &
as a springboard for world revolution.
Not to mention Germany helping the radicals
(Lenin) with arms & money.
Miran being Miran has to always be different.
In sum, if the Masters didn't want a regime change, the opposition
leaders of 78
hich gohi ham nemi tunestan bokhorand!
how the KK Khomeini too wanted to export his shit religion to
whole world with total disregard to the majority of Muslims who
his religion! Miranian gondeh guzi has no limits.
It was cultural
& political shortcomings of this nature that brought about
the collapse of tsarism, not "oppression" or "misery".
... Economic &
social difficulties did not contribute significantly to the revolutionary
threat that hung over Russia before 1917. Whatever grievances
may have harbored-real & fancied- the "masses" neither
desired a revolution: the only group interested in it was the
Stress on alleged popular discontent & class conflict derives
ideological preconceptions than from the facts at hand, namely
discredited idea that political developments are always &
driven by socioeconomic conflicts, that they are mere "foam"
surface of currents that really guide human destiny.
Not only Miranians had far more "oppression" & "misery"
after 78, but they almost
lost the whole damn country. Lucky the Master's OIL was under
their land, so they
saved the country!
make things worst, even their "religion" got F*ed in
the process & most of their
real good clergies were pushed out of the picture.
Feb 1917 was
not a "worker's revolution" : industrial labor played
the role of a chorus that reacted to & amplified the actions
of the true
protagonist, the army. The mutiny of the Petrograd garrison stimulated
disorders among the civilian population unhappy over inflation
The mutiny could've been contained had Nicholas chosen to quell
the same brutality Lenin & Trotsky employed 4 years later
with the Kronshtadt rising & nationwide peasant rebellions.
But Lenin's &
Trotsky's sole concern was holding on to power, whereas Nicholos
for Russia. When the generals & Duma politicians persuaded
he had to go to save the army & avert a humiliating capitulation,
acquiesced. Had staying in power been his supreme objective, he
easily have concluded peace with Germany & turned the army
the mutineers. The record leaves no doubt that the myth of the
forced from the throne by the rebellious workers & peasants
is just that.
The tsar yielded not to a rebellious populace but to generals
& he did so from a sense of patriotic duty.
The social revolution followed rather than preceded the act of
Lenin was in Germany getting paid to set the country on fire while
living in luxury!
too happened in Miran. The old regime chose not to butcher
pee-pole, but the KK Mullahs & the Goh Mojaahedin & Jendeyeh
brushed it off as weak & tried to pour more fuel over the
fire to set the
whole god damn country on fire. The KK Khomeini even had some
Goh true-blue-no-bell Miranian set fire to a cinema, where 400
were LOCKed in, to burn them all & put the blame on the old
All this while many many Goh Miranians were getting paid by this/that
Master, like they always had been. Not to mention non-Miranians,
in chaador behind the herd of Miranian gaav/olaaq, shooting at
soldiers to force them shoot back.
1980 the shit had hit the fan, the facts were out about the filthy
& the whole country was F*ed, but Miranians did NOTHING to
save their country &
their future. They proved beyond any doubt what gaav/olaaq they
always have been.
intelligentsia were forced to shut the F* up, or they saw that
wanted the KIR to be up, so they all went khaarej waiting for
the next green-light
for the regime change in Miran, shouting cho-miran-lavaashak to
make them feel good.
The country at large- its political entities as well as its resources-
the subject of duvan, the division of loot, which no one was strong
to stop until it had run its course.
to power on that anarchy, which he did much to promote.
He promised every discontented group what it wanted. ... In fact,
these pledges ran contrary to his program & all were violated
after they had served their purpose, which was to undermine the
government's efforts to stabilize the country. ... Lenin &
their bid for one-party dictatorship with slogans calling for
of power to the soviets ...
The question is how the F* a Goh khaarej
educated F*ing "mohandes"
Bazagaan could not have known what KK MF the Mullahs were, how
the asshole didn't know that KK Khomeini, having had Kasravi murdered,
could never ever have been anything but a KK khunkhaar dictator?!
It's impossible to believe that all the KK opposition leaders
of 78 didn't
know. They did know, but they also knew that the Masters, after
years, had decided to remove Shah, so they put their F*ing EGO
front & used the cattle of Miranian gaav/olaaq to get to power
mattered more to them than anything else. So they all bullshitted
gave all sorts of promises to get to power. They all would've
killer bully dictators who would have butchered all who dared
them, after so many years of being on the pay-roll of the Masters
craving for power.
is part of the Goh culture of Miran. If u don't dominate, u will
regarded as weak & bullies will walk all over u.
The so called
"October revolution" was a classic coup d'etat. The
preparations for it were so clandestine that when Kamenev disclosed
in a newspaper interview a week before the event was to take place,
the party intended to seize power, Lenin declared him a traitor
his expulsion. Genuine revolutions, of course, are not scheduled
...one has to look closely at the events of Oct 1917 in Petrograd
the "masses" acting as spectators, ignoring Bolshevik
appeals to storm
the winter palace, where sat elderly ministers of the provisional
clad in overcoats, defended by youthful cadets, a battalion of
a platoon of invalids.
Wow! I also remember the "mass cattle
playing allaaho-akbar-baazi on their roof tops having a good time
partying, not having a f*ing clue they were being used to F* their
country & lives. Mind you they only dared to do this after
that it would be 'safe' for them to do so. This is how the mass
went to tazaahoraat too, they only did it after they knew it would
would be 'safe', & they did it for curiosity, too stupid to
goh-khori they were doing. While so many Goh qaaltaaq laat savage
street kids making a riot & destroying things & feeling
the killer Mullahs took over & proved they meant business
by killing most of
opposition an-qollaabi, the pee-pole just shut the F* up &
went back hiding in their
"andaruns", like they always did.
his historical prominence not to his statesmanship, which was
of a very inferior order, but to his generalship. His innovation,
for his success, was militarizing policies. ... politicizing warfare
him to seize power & then to hold on to it. It did not help
him to build
a viable social & political order. He grew so accustomed to
all "fronts" that even after asserting undisputed authority
over soviet Russia
..., he had to invent ever new enemies to fight & destroy:
now the church,
now the socialist-revolutionaries, now the intelligentsia. This
became a fixed feature of the communist regime, culminating in
notorious "theory" that the closer communism approached
the more intense grew social conflict- a notion that justified
of unprecedented ferocity.
ceased to be utopians when, once it had become obvious
the ideal was unattainable, they persisted in the attempt with
unrestrained violence. ... For this reason they should be regarded
utopians but as fanatics: since they refused to admit defeat even
stared them in the face, they satisfied Santayana's definition
as redoubling one's efforts after forgetting one's aim.
violence, violence that strove for the destruction of every
actual & potential opponent, was for Lenin not only the most
but the only way of dealing with problems.
KK Khomeini brought out the violence, which
is a major part of the
Goh culture of Miran, in Miranians & took it to new heights
in the name
of Allah. The violence & corruption was so bad that many Goh
pro-KIR ane-qollaabi got turned off & pulled out of the system,
felt any guilt that it was THEY who gave rise to this monster
& qaatel regime.
They just pulled out, many left for khaarej, either forgetting
behind Allah, saying that Allah will punish the evil Mullahs.
following their shit religion, never questioned what they did
or what happened
or how could any God give rise to the monster KK Mullahs.
means anything it means 2 propositions: that as capitalist
society matures it is doomed to collapse from inner contradictions,
that this collapse("revolution") is effected by industrial
labor ("the proletariat").
What do we see in Russia? a "socialist revolution" carried
out in an
economically underdeveloped country in which capitalism was still
infancy, & power taken by a party committed to the view that
class left to its own devices is unrevolutionary. Subsequently,
stage of its history, the communist regime in Russia did whatever
to do to beat off challengers, without regard to Marxist doctrine,
it cloaked its actions with Marxist slogans. Lenin succeeded precisely
because he was free of the Marxist scruples that inhibited the
Wow, I'm speechless again!
These asshole power hungry killer EGO maniacs get millions killed
tortured & raped & starved to death, destroying a nation
for over 70
years, but they were never ever F*ing communists?!!!
Even after they got smart enough to reject the KK Stalin, they
continued the charade of "communism"!
How the F* could Miranian Tudeh party be so F*ing stupid?!
OK, I can understand that their KK leaders were on the payroll,
what about the others in the party? I could understand the idiot
angry(from sexual frustration & the Goh culture) ane-qollaabi
"students" getting into the party to fix some of their
serve their EGO or ..., but what about so many over 40 people
in the party?
In a way the KK Khomeini did the same! He used a shit version
"Islam", which most Muslims in the world would completely
reject, & used
it to gain POWER in Miran to create a killer dictatorship in the
of Allah, whom most of its followers regard as Karim-Rahmaan/merciful
He then used his power to destroy & butcher all opposition
the country in the process, even before the stupid War, which
his own holy
"brothers" started. And what did the cattle gaav/olaaq
Miranians do? They
just either joined this killer regime, which was supposed to replace
regime, which was in reality much kinder & "caring",
or left for Khaarej,
or just put up with the nightmare for over 25 F*ing years.
I can't see how the old regime could be blamed. It was only created
the "culture" over centuries of mismanagement. What
intellectuals, shouldn't knowledge add to their responsibilities?
After all the army didn't force the old regime out to take over,
suggested creating a parliament to improve things. But the KK
intelligentsia, the power hungry bullies, did everything they
destroy the old regime & a nation, so that they could come
to power &
completely change the nations in their own filthy image. Surely
intellectuals should've seen it coming. But according to R Pipes
think the Bolsheviks could last long, & they didn't(well only
70 years), but they
sure did destroy the nation in over 70 years of terror.
Now the good news.
If terror can't last for long & will eventually fail to rule
in the long run, then
KIR will have to come down, even if the Masters don't bring it
to Miliukov, bolshevism had 2 aspects: one is international;
the other is genuinely Russian. The international aspect of bolshevism
is due to its origin in a very advanced European theory. Its purely
Russian aspect is chiefly concerned with its practice, which is
rooted in Russian reality &, far from breaking with the "ancient
reasserts Russian's past in the present.
who viewed the revolution primarily in spiritual terms, denied
that Russia even had a revolution: "all of the past is repeating
& acts only behind new masks".
I can bet that once the KIR falls, many
Miranians will come out & say that
Miran didn't have a revolution. I know I've been saying this,
people will be from the KIR regime itself, including many Goh
KIR will fall, coz if communism couldn't last over 70 years, surely
couldn't last over 40. Specially when u consider Masters making
changing regimes like yoyo, it should be happening soon.
rested on 4 pillars: 1, autocracy, that is,
personal rule unconstrained by either constitution or representative
bodies; 2, the autocrat's ownership of the country's resources,
is to say, the virtual absence of private property; 3, the autocrat's
right to demand unlimited services from his subjects, resulting
lack of either collective or individual rights; & 4, state
information. A comparison of tsarist rule at its Zenith with the
communist regime as it looked by the time of Lenin's death reveals
To begin with,
the autocracy. Traditionally, the Russian monarch
concentrated in his hands full legislative & executive powers,
them without interference from external bodies. He administered
the help of a service nobility & a bureaucracy that owed allegiance
his person rather than to the nation or the state. Lenin from
day in office instinctively followed this model. Although as a
to the ideal of democracy he gave the country a constitution &
representative bodies, they performed purely ceremonial functions,
the constitution was not binding on the communist party, the country's
true ruler, & the parliament was not elected but hand-picked
by the same
party. In the performance of his duties, Lenin resembled the most
autocratic of the tsars, Peter I & Nicholas I, in that he
personally attending to the most trifling details of state affairs,
if the country were his private domain.
In all these
instances [-- book gives examples of the 4 aspects--] the
Bolsheviks found models not in the writings of Marx, Engels, or
western socialists, but in their own history: not so much the
described in books but that which they had experienced in their
persons fighting tsarism under the regime of Reinforced &
Safeguard instituted in the 1880s to deter the revolutionary intelligentsia.
These practices they justified with arguments borrowed from socialist
literature that gave them a mandate to behave with a brutality
ruthlessness that far exceeded anything known under tsarism, for
was inhibited by the desire to be viewed favorably by Europe,
the Bolsheviks treated Europe as an enemy.
rejected democracy- & this they did conclusively
in Jan 1918 by dispersing the Constituent Assembly- they had no
but to govern autocratically.
Just F*ing beautiful, a group of asshole
bully killers, took over the
whole F*ing country & got millions killed & butchered
& tortured &
starved & bullied for over 70 years, in the name of equality
for all; but in reality instead of justice they created just-piss
the worst & most cruel regime Russia ever had, brainwashing
world that Russian people rose up against the old regime to make
this is awfully close to events in Miran. In fact it was far worst
in Miran because the KK Mullahs, using the name of a merciful-God,
destroyed God & religion in Miran!
for democracy, the KK Khomeini, after giving all sorts of BS promises
& coming to power, said "democracy would lead to prostitution"!
can a Goh culture create anything but Goh religion & Goh pee-pole?
Nor is it
surprising that the Russian revolution should have ended up
where it did. revolutionaries may have the most radical ideas
man & society, but they must build the new order with human
molded by the past. For that reason, sooner or later, they succumb
the past themselves. "revolution" derives from the Latin
"to revolve", a concept originally applied to the motions
of the planets,
& used by medieval astrologers to explain sudden & unexpected
human events. And objects that revolve do return to their starting
Even the French "revolution" resulted in massive blood
shed & cruelty &
execution & turned into an "empire" with an Emperor
can bet that France would've been far better off without its "revolution".
is far better than "revolution".
terms of its own aspirations, the communist regime was a
monumental failure: it succeeded in one thing only-staying in
but since for Bolsheviks power was not an end in itself but means
end, its mere retention does not qualify the experiment as a success.
The Bolsheviks made no secret of their aims: toppling everywhere
based on private property & replacing them with a worldwide
socialist societies. They succeeded nowhere outside the boundaries
what had been the Russian empire in spreading their regime until
of WW2, when the red army stepped into the vacuum created in eastern
Europe by the surrender of Germany, the Chinese communists seized
of their country from the Japanese, & communist dictatorships,
by Moscow, established themselves in a number of recently emancipated
KIR too was a "monumental failure".
It could not export Shit Islam to the whole world, not even with
their attack & capture
of Makkah! KIR destroyed the country & culture & religion
& economy & made most
of Muslims government of the world hostile to it.
It also did a lot of damage to image of "Islam".
Once it had
proven impossible to export communism, the Bolsheviks in 1920s
decided themselves to constructing a socialist society at home.
endeavor failed as well. Lenin had expected through a combination
expropriations & terror to transform his country in a matter
into the world's leading economic power: instead, he ruined the
he had inherited. .. he saw political dissent ... workers turned
backs on the communists & the peasants rebelled ...
... even terror
proved useless in overcoming the ingrained habits of an ancient
failed because it preceded from the erroneous doctrine of the
enlightenment, perhaps the most pernicious idea in the history
that man is merely a material compound, devoid of either soul
ideas, & as such a passive product of an infinitely malleable
environment. This doctrine made it possible for people with personal
frustrations to project them onto the society & attempt to
there rather than in themselves.
...Even if subjected to the fiercest dressage, he cannot pass
lessons he has been forced to learn to his children, who come
world ever fresh, asking questions that are supposed to have been
once & for all. To demonstrate this commonsensical truth required
millions of dead, incalculable suffering for the survivors, &
of a great nation.
Not to mention the fact that every new generation
will always look down
at the old & will try to find new things/fashion/ideas to
& "superior" to the old one.
After centuries of brainwashing, not only Mullahs could not even
Noruz from Miran, but eventually people like Kasravi rose up against
them, whom they had murdered. However, not only far more Miranian
intellectuals speak against the shit-Islam today, but far more
non-intellectuals Miranians speak out against the filthy Mullahs
than ever before.
Mullahs have proven once & for all what KK khunkhaar M*Jendeh
& always have been. But the credit should go to the Goh culture
such a shit region with filthy killer clergies.
of how such a flawed regime succeeded in maintaining itself
in power for so long certainly cannot be met with the answer that,
we may think of it, it had the support of its own people.
Anyone who explains the durability of a government not based on
mandate of its citizens by its alleged popularity must apply the
rationale to every other enduring authoritarian regime, including
-which survived not 7 decades but 7 centuries- & then still
unenviable task of having to explain how tsarism, presumably so
popular, collapsed in a matter of days.
communist slogan "we will drive mankind to happiness by force!".
KK Khomeini must have thought that he could "drive the mankind
by force", in fact he did force many to their death &
sent them to hell,
but he only managed to create HELL in Miran.
knew Lenin intimately, agreed with Mussolini that he regarded
human beings as a metalworker regarded ore. His was but an extreme
expression of an attitude common to radical intellectuals everywhere.
I'd say this is far worst in Miran where
the word for the peasants &
laborer, dehaati & amaleh, are used as insults. Where the
in-tell-egg-chew-alls have used "savaad" to establish
forcing others to call them doktor & mohandes, to highlight
superiority, while using many as slave/kolfat/nokar in their houses.
Bullshitting about democracy & equality to serve their EGO
treating others as "equal". A culture, where compassion
& kindness to
others only exists in poetry/theory, where only power & superiority
others matter in reality; where if you don't dominate others,
you will be
It runs contrary
to the morally superior as well as more realistic principle
of Kant's that man must never be used as merely means for the
others, but must always be regarded also as an end in himself.
this vantage point, the excesses of the Bolsheviks, their readiness
sacrifice countless lives for their own purposes, were a monstrous
of both ethics & common sense. They ignored that the means-
& even the lives of people- are very real, whereas the ends
nebulous & often unattainable.
It was far worst with the KK Mullahs. Not
only they used a shit version
of Islam, which is totally against the original principles &
Islam. But they destroyed the good image of what was left after
of brainwashing & proved what monsters they were, forcing
any 'good' Mullah
to shut up or rot in prison. They even destroyed the economy &
in process. No matter how you look at it, it was completely against
logic or sense. So not only their shit ideals was "unattainable",
completely destructive & even against the religion they claimed
principle that applies in this case has been formulated by Karl
Popper: "everyone has the right to sacrifice himself for
a cause he deems
deserving. No one has the right to sacrifice others of incite
sacrifice themselves for an idea".
be rendaan makon ey zaahede paakizeh seresht,
ke gonaahe degaraan bar to nakhaahand nevesht.
always find it incredible how some Islamic leaders talk young
into suicide missions, but never tell their own kids/relatives
to do it.
If nothing could be more important than being in heaven with God,
don't they do it or tell their own kids to do it?
modern society is so "vast & complicated" &
difficult to grasp, it is neither proper nor feasible to impose
patterns of conduct, let alone try to remake it. What cannot be
comprehended cannot be controlled. The tragic & sordid history
Russian revolution- such as it really was, not as it appears to
imagination of those foreign intellectuals for whom it was a noble
attempt to elevate mankind- teaches that political authority must
be employed for ideological ends. It is best to let people be.
words attributed to Oscar Wilde to a Chinese sage: there is such
as leaving mankind alone- but there never was such a thing as
baalaa raftim masst bud,
paa'in umadim duq bud,
anqolaabe maa duruq bud,
dine maa duruq bud,
dolate maa duruq bud,
keshvare maa duruq bud,
zendegiye maa duruq bud.