Not Monarchist
but Pahlaviist!
Don't name them Monarchists, but name them Pahlaviists!
Ahreeman X
May 21, 2007
 
L.
The Opie Pahlavi
R. The Dopey Pahlavi
I believe it
is wrong to name the majority of the present monarchists as simple
Monarchists or Constitutional Monarchists, because they are not
only the believers in the monarchy or constitutional monarchy. They
do not just believe in the fundamentals of the monarchy but more!
Ask them if
they would like Qajar, Zand, Afsharid or any other dynasty or a
new dynasty to return to power? They will clearly answer you: "No"!
Today's monarchists
are not actually just monarchists or constitutional monarchists,
but it is correct to refer to them as:
Pahlaviist
Khaye Malan-e Pahlavi (Pahlavi Ball Polishers)
Or best put,
Nokaran-e Pahlavi (Servants of Pahlavi)
So these people
are not truly monarchists but they are "Servants of Pahlavi".
Their sole purpose is to return the Pahlavi Dynasty to power and
crown and throne Reza Pahlavi by all means necessary. To them, a
good nationalist is a servant of Pahlavi and slave to Reza Pahlavi.
Aside from Hezbollah,
these people are the most reactionary and fanatical movement in
the Iranian politics. They are blind to the fact that Reza Pahlavi
is the worst candidate for monarchy, presidency, any political office,
any management position, any simple job or even walking the family
dog! They are blind to the fact that Reza Pahlavi is basically a
waste of oxygen! As long as his last name is Pahlavi, then they
will get erections to revive the Pahlavi Dictatorship by erecting
Reza Pahlavi as a monarch!
These people
are obsessed with over 50 years of the Pahlavi's Absolutist Dictatorship
and they love to return Iran back to pre 1979 era! They gain erections
just thinking about it!
So maybe all
of you need to ponder and maybe we should revise the title of our
argumentation:
Monarchy
or Republic?
to:
Pahlaviism
or Democracy?
Simply because,
this is not a logical argument between monarchists and republicans,
but this is all about Pahlaviism or Democracy?
On one side,
we have absolutist servants of the Pahlavis and House Niggers to
Reza Pahlavi and then on the other side we have the Democratic Forces.
This is definitely
not about Monarchists vs Republicans, but it is all about,
Pahlaviism vs
Democracy!
To understand
Pahlaviism, all you have to do is try to speak against the Pahlavis
in monarchists' forums, radios, TVs, magazines and newspapers and
see what will happen!
Even if you
get lucky to bypass the primary censorship, then you will right
away be deleted, knocked off the air, not published or shutten up!
Their media is exactly the same as the situation of Iran pre-1979!
This is their goal, to return Iran to the Shahollah Era.
All this garbage
talk and superficial shallow speeches about "Constitutional
Monarchy", "Democratic Monarchy" and etc. is nonsense.
All they want to do is to return Pahlavis via Reza Pahlavi on the
crown, back to Iran. That is their sole purpose.

The
unavoidable eminent Fall of the Pahlavi Dictatorship,
was a historical destiny and a destined political evolution.
A "Pahlavi
Constitutional Monarchy" of Shahollah is as oxy moronic as
the "Islamic Democracy" of Khatami and the Reform movement!
The whole ideology
of these Pahlaviists is based on a lie! They claim to be "Constitutional
Monarchists", so ask any of them, specifically Reza Pahlavi
II, that:
Question the Pahlaviists?
If you believe
in the constitutional monarchy, then:
1. How come your grand father "Reza Shah The Great"
had overthrown the legal and democratic "Constitutional
Monarchy of Qajar" and Ahmad Shah Qajar via a coup?
2. How come you support over 50 years of the illegal "Absolutist
Dictatorship of Pahlavi" but you condemn the legal and
democratic "Constitutional Monarchy of Qajar"?
3. Why did the masses of Iran and commanders Satar Khan, Baqer Khan
and other constitutionalists had fought the Absolutist Dictatorship
of Mozafar al Din Shah Qajar, committed the "Constitutionalist
Revolution of Iran", and created the legal and democratic
Constitutional Monarchy of Qajar on 1906? So that the Pahlavis
would overthrow it via a coup and establish the Pahlavi Dynasty
and the Absolutist Dictatorship of Pahlavi on 1925?
You see, these
people are not constitutional monarchists, but they are fascist
thugs and Pahlaviists. They just use the façade
of constitutional monarchy to fool the public! The funny thing is
that even their guru (so claimed) Reza Shah The Great was a Republican in heart and hated these thugs! Read:
Reza
Shah The Great, the Real Story
So distinguish
between the "Constitutional Monarchy" and "Pahlaviism".
To believe in both is an oxy moron.
I want you to
ask yourselves that:
We came a long
way (28 + years) and gained much democratic education, to once more,
let it all banish by yet another Pahlavi Absolutist Dictatorship,
yes or no?

The
Imminent Downfall of the Shah by David Suter
This is the End of All Tyrants.
Learn from
the history or you will be doomed to repeat the same historical
mistakes!
Today, monarchists
are a slim minority force, absolutely an irrelevant factor to the
future of Iran; however, one should always recall the 1920s and
the small and irrelevant little party named the Nazi Party, and
then see how they took over the power in the 1930s and then destroyed
the world and Germany in 1940s. Even though Pahlaviists are little
clowns and comic relieves of the Iranian politics, yet there should
be a committee created and named as: "The Pahlavi Watch"
(same as the Islamist Watch) to make sure that these fascist clowns
will always remain in chains and under tight leashes. Kick these
Pahlaviists down and then keep on kicking them hard to make sure
that they will stay down and never stand up, because once they stand
up, then all your hopes for the future democracy (post IRI) will
fall! Afterall, there are not much difference between The Shahollah
and The Hezbollah, now is there?
Say it loud
and say it with pride:
"No
Gods
No Shahs
No Imams
No Masters
No Prophets
I bow to no Gods.
I serve no Masters.
I control my own destiny.
I am a Thinking Man.
I am a Free Man."
Amen!
Dr.
X
Comments
Do
you have a comment on this article?
Then go to the IPC Club and post it here:
Monarchy
or Republic?
Do
you have a comment on any IPC article?
Then go to the IPC Club's "Comments on IPC Website Room",
create a respond topic (Re: ------) and state your mind:
Comments
on IPC Website Room
Back to Politics Index
|